Can the future of SIGINT keep pace with your rifleman, or will it stay stuck in the TOC? This piece explores the shift from cloud-based intercept dreams back to muddy kill-chain realities—and what doctrine, gear, and training need to evolve to make SIGINT lethal and survivable in LSCO.
China and Russia are syncing doctrine while NATO’s still drawing Cold War maps. What happens when Russian fires in Kaliningrad sync with Chinese A2/AD in the Taiwan Strait? Are we training to fight the last war while a new one is forming on the horizon?
Are we treating near-peer joint drills like the real war before the war? This piece breaks down what China and Russia’s joint exercises are truly signaling, how they’re merging doctrine and shaping the battlefield, and what U.S. and NATO forces must do doctrinally, operationally, and in training to stay ahead of their synchronized moves.
We examine how Russia, China, and Iran weaponize stories to shape battlefields before tanks roll, fracturing alliances and influencing policy through disinformation and narrative warfare. It also offers actionable recommendations for doctrine, training, and IO integration so NATO and the U.S. can win in the narrative domain before kinetic operations even begin.
Rebuilding the Kill Chain breaks down how NATO is shifting from counterinsurgency-era doctrine to a corps-level, LSCO-ready force. Drawing on Ukraine’s battlefield improvisations and China’s structured kill web development, this paper uses FM 3-09, JP 3-0, and ATP 2-33.4 to trace the kill chain’s transformation—faster, flatter, and fused across domains.
Part I: Kill Chain Compression breaks down how Ukrainian forces shrank the traditional sensor-to-shooter process from hours to minutes—turning smartphones, commercial drones, and improvised comms into precision fire networks. This isn’t theory—it’s kill chain innovation under fire, and it’s reshaping the future of LSCO.
